Saturday, December 7, 2013

DNA of O1A1, O-M101 and P203


根据Mizuno等2008年的论文,得到16例配型为O1a1-P203的样本,数据来源:YHRD。具体数据见下表。

表:配型为O1a1-P203的日本人样本
单倍型
样本数
地区
17Y-STR
家族或支系
H1
2
爱媛、千叶
日本O1望族核心型
日本O1望族
H2
1
冲绳
与H1差2步
日本O1望族
H3
1
宫城
与H1差2步
日本O1望族
H4
1
奈良
与H1差2步
日本O1望族
H5
1
青森
与H1差3步
日本O1望族
H6
1
群马
与H1差4步
日本O1望族所属支系
H7
1
和歌山
与H1差4步
日本O1望族所属支系
H8
1
冈山
与H1差6步
日本O1望族所属支系
H9
1
群马
日本O1第二家族核心型
日本O1第二家族
H10
1
冈山
与H9差2步
日本O1第二家族
H11
1
群马
与O1星簇核心型差3步
O1星簇
H12
1
奈良
与O1星簇核心型差5步
O1星簇所属支系
H13
1
福冈
与中国O1第二家族核心型差1步
中国O1第二家族
H14
1
静冈
与韩国一高频单倍型差3步
韩国O1望族
H15
1
北海道
与韩国一样本差4步
韩国一O1支系

从上表可以看到,有8个单倍型9例样本属于日本O1望族和其所属支系,占日本P203样本数的56%。那么,这个日本O1望族和其所属支系是从哪里来的呢?
把日本O1望族的核心型与世界各国样本进行比对,发现浙江汉族样本与日本O1望族核心型最为接近,日本O1望族相关样本的多样性在浙江汉族中也最丰富,而且,浙江汉族的第一高频单倍型与日本O1望族核心型在17Y-STR相差只有5步,属于同一支系。因为浙江汉族第一高频单倍型所属支系基本分布在东南沿海,在中国内陆和北方极为少见。所以日本O1望族和其所属支系应来自中国东南沿海。如果说距今8000年前到距今2000年前,中国东南沿海的主要居民是越人,则日本O1望族和其所属支系应是来自越人。由日本O1望族和其所属支系占日本P203的56%,可知至少一半以上的日本P203来自越人。

再来看日本O1第二家族,有2例日本样本属于日本O1第二家族,占把日本P203的13%。这个日本O1第二家族是来自哪里呢?
把日本O1第二家族的核心型与世界各国样本进行比对,发现台湾原住民样本不仅与日本O1第二家族的核心型最为接近,而且日本O1第二家族相关样本的多样性在台湾原住民中最为丰富。由此,日本O1第二家族应来自台湾原住民,因为台湾原住民就是古代越人的支系,所以日本O1第二家族应来自越人。

日本O1望族、日本O1第二家族均来自越人,两者合计,占日本P203的69%。

有3例日本P203样本分别属于O1星簇、O1星簇所属支系和中国O1第二家族。
O1星簇和O1星簇所属支系在中国许多民族中有广泛分布,做粗略估算,在满族、锡伯族、鄂温克族中最高,其次为京族、回族和羌族,再次为汉族。尽管如此,从根源上说,O1星簇和O1星簇所属支系应是源自东南沿海的越人。满—通古斯语族在文化上与越人也有许多相似之处。至少从8000年前起,中国东南沿海的主体居民就可以被称之为越人,而O1星簇的形成和分布格局应产生于3000年前左右。从这个意义上,属于O1星簇和O1星簇所属支系的样本根源于越人。
中国O1第二家族与OI星簇有相似之处,但主要分布于中部和南方,与楚人关系密切。从根源上,中国O1第二家族源自华南地区的越人。从这个意义上,属于中国O1家族的样本根源于越人。

综合以上分析,日本O1望族、日本O1第二家族均来自越人,O1星簇和中国O1第二家族均根源于越人,合计88%的日本P203来自越人。

那么另2例韩国类型的P203样本就不是来自越人吗?让我们继续分析。
其中1例日本 P203样本属于韩国的一个O1望族,把这个韩国O1望族的核心型与世界各国样本进行比对,发现中国南方汉族样本最接近韩国O1望族的核心型,韩国O1望族核心型相关样本的多样性也是在中国南方汉族中最为丰富。由此,韩国O1望族应来自中国南方,确切地说,韩国O1望族应来自古代居住在中国南方沿海的越人。
其中另1例日本P203样本属于韩国的一个P203支系,那么这例样本会来自华北人群吗?或者说,可能来自早期北上的P203支系吗?把与这例日本P203样本最接近的韩国样本与世界各国样本进行比对,发现其与台湾原住民样本最接近,而且其相关样本的多样性在台湾原住民中最丰富。所以这例日本P203样本所属的韩国P203支系应来自台湾原住民,因为台湾原住民就是古代越人的支系,所以这例日本P203样本所属的韩国P203支系应来自越人。

综上所述,日本O1望族、日本O1第二家族均来自越人,O1星簇和中国O1第二家族均根源于越人,韩国O1望族和韩国的一个P203支系在源流上还是来自越人。由此,从Mizuno等2008年论文数据中反映出日本P203全部来自越人。我们不说日本P203的100%来自越人,但我们完全可以确定,日本P203的主体来自越人!

http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_7eb83c96010175bi.html




有自称是赵宋王室后裔的人测出是O1a1,

而O1a1兴起于浙江。

后来南宋王朝又蜗居浙江,难道Y-DNA指使赵构迁都临安?

今天浙江O1a1比例能到20%, 或许有部分是南宋王室近期爆发的结果。

另外女真人中也有O1a1,怀疑是当年被掳北宋徽钦二帝的后裔也能对应。

感觉是有点戏剧性。

  • 1楼
  • 2012-02-18 10:57


O1a1在北方普遍低频 (01A1 is uncommon in the North)

  • 2楼
  • 2012-02-18 10:58

吧友122.82.65.*

那么很可能梁姓 黄姓 秦姓 徐姓 李姓中的一部分就是01系染色体基因,东夷赢姓,赢姓赵氏,可能还有*姓赵氏,但与赢姓无关 (Ying is a DongYi surname, the parent clan name of Liang,梁姓 Huang,黄姓 Qin,秦姓 Xu,徐姓 Zhao,赵姓 and they belong to the 01 genes






O1a1在北方普遍低频

  • 2楼
  • 2012-02-18 10:58

吧友122.82.65.*

那么很可能梁姓 黄姓 秦姓 徐姓 李姓中的一部分就是01系染色体基因,东夷赢姓,赢姓赵氏,可能还有*姓赵氏,但与赢姓无关

  • 3楼
  • 2012-02-22 22:28


O1在一组O3接近样本几乎没有的满族数据(275人)中比例很高,而且有不少望族,在一组O3接近样本很多的满族(201人)数据中比例却反而下降。O1是女真人固有的单倍群。


http://tieba.baidu.com/p/1417963441

According to the above the surname Ying which is the main parent surname of MA, NG, QIN, ZHAO etc are of DongYi origin. DongYi are related to Korean. Does it mean the Korean are from the original Han Chinese? Mandarin is not Han Language, According to one of the article in my other post Cantonese Dialect a southern language is said to be the original Han dialect and many of the dialect combined have similar words with the Korean language.




我很高兴能看到这些我也性赵我们家族虽没什么确切的证明但久久传下了这么个话我们先被认为朝族但寻根究底是中国汉族当年南宋迁动之时有一些被流落到朝鲜半岛也是现今韩国后来慢慢被改为韩性赵我查了很久可是我确实没发现朝族有跟我们同个性的人朝族一个性分很多种而用汉语翻译就是白清赵而我在网上找了很久到至尽一点头绪也没有除了我们家确实没有白清赵随家长都说我们家是当年赵筐胤的后代但终无任何凭据所以我想知道我们到底是关于那里的人至尽也搞不明白先祖为何人我很想知道答案如果有任何相关的答案请务必告知谢谢 http://tieba.baidu.com/p/28194811














Family tree DNA
http://www.familytreedna.com/public/o3/default.aspx?section=ysnp

N111084SalakoryO1a1O-P203.1M119+, M175+, P203.1+, 47z-, IMS-JST002611-, M101-, M122-, M134-, M159-, M162-, M50-
219220LiuO1a1O-P203.1M119+, P203.1+, M101-, M122-, M50-
223228WangO1a1O-P203.1M119+, P203.1+, M101-, M50-
96857TeoO1a1O-P203.1M119+, P203.1+, M101-, M50-
N9337FanO1a1O-P203.1M119+, P203.1+, M101-, M50-


N45782MaOO-M175M175+
N53618ShenOO-M175M175+
N53620ShenOO-M175M175+
N53622ShenOO-M175M175+
N53623ShenOO-M175M175+
N53625ShenOO-M175M175+
N53627ShenOO-M175M175+
N53628ShenOO-M175M175+
N53629ShenOO-M175M175+
N55062LeeOO-M175M175+
N55969TanOO-M175M175+
155190GrepoO1aO-M119
178623ParisO1aO-M119M119+, M101-, M50-, P203.1-

235468SultanovO2O-P31
268333YoonO2O-P31K18+, M175+, P31+, PK4-, SRY465-
267024ShinO2O-P31K2+
N37595LimO2O-P31M175+, P31+, M95-, P49-
N70832WandasanO2O-P31P31+, M95-, P49-, SRY465-
N40772WongO2aO-M95M175+, M95+
N71748GangulyO2aO-M95M175+, M95+, M88-

184826KluanyshO3a3cO-M134
184839TO3a3cO-M134
184804Kuanyshbai MadreimovO3a3cO-M134
229673QiaoO3a3cO-M134L1361+, L1362+, M122+, M134+, M175+, IMS-JST002611-, L1360-, M101-, M117-, M119-, M121-, M162-, P101-
N73444MizunoO3a3cO-M134M122+, M134+, IMS-JST002611-, M113-, M117-, M159-, M162-, M164-, M300-, P101-
77254GrigorievO3a3cO-M134M122+, M134+, M117-, M133-, M162-, P101-
N61343ChuangO3a3cO-M134M122+, M134+, P93+, M117-, M159-, M162-, M7-, P101-
27564Jawan BakhtO3a3cO-M134M134+
151040Daulet KZ,к.э.н.,PhDO3a3cO-M134M134+, M117-, M162-, P101-
49238AbrahamO3a3cO-M134M134+, M175+
80057TuruspekovO3a3cO-M134M134+, M175+
115239LohO3a3cO-M134M134+, M175+, M133-, P101-


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O-M122
Aheu (Laos)0.15838Cai 2011M122
Bugan (Yunnan)0.15632Cai 2011M122
Cambodia0.14Shi 2009
Cham (Binh Thuan, Vietnam)0.13659He 2012M122
Java (mainly sampled in Dieng)0.13161Karafet 2010M122
Aboriginal Taiwanese0.126223Tajima 2004M122
Uighur (Kazakhstan)0.12241Wells 2001M122
Uzbek (Bukhara)0.12158Wells 2001M122
Karakalpak (Uzbekistan)0.11444Wells 2001M122
Bo (Laos)0.10728Cai 2011M122
Tibetans0.1Zhou 2008
Maluku Islands0.130Karafet 2010M122
Kazakh (Kazakhstan)0.09354Wells 2001M122
Pumi (Ninglang, Yunnan)0.08547Wen 2004M122(xM7)
Mongols0.08324Wells 2001M122
Balinese (Bali)0.073641Karafet 2010M122
Sinte (Uzbekistan)0.06715Wells 2001M122
Iranian (Esfahan)0.06316Wells 2001M122
Flores0.046394Karafet 2010M122
Buyei0.04Yang 2005
Kazakhs (SW Altai)0.03330Dulik 2011M134(xM117, P101)
Burusho0.03197Firasat 2007M122
Sumba0.029350Karafet 2010M122
Naxi (Lijiang, Yunnan)0.02540Wen 2004M134
Pathan0.01096Firasat 2007M122
Pakistan0.005638Firasat 2007M122


SNP (single-nucleotide polymorphism) is a single nucleotide (A, T, C or G) difference between two DNA sequences. SNP occur as a result of point mutations, and they are used as molecular genetic markers that define a particular haplogroup.


Haplogroup O-M175

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Haplogroup O-M175
Haplogrupo O (ADN-Y).PNG
Possible time of origin28,000-41,000 years BP (Scheinfeldt 2006)
Possible place of originSoutheast or East Asia[citation needed]
AncestorNO
DescendantsO-MSY2.2O-M268O-M122
Defining mutationsM175, P186, P191, P196[citation needed]
In molecular evolution, a haplogroup (from the Greekἁπλούςhaploûs, "onefold, single, simple") is a group of similar haplotypes that share a common ancestor having the same single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mutation in all haplotypes. Haplogroup O-M175 is a Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup of Southeast Asian and East Asian lineage. It descends from Haplogroup NO.

Origins[edit]

Haplogroup O-M175 is a descendant haplogroup of Haplogroup NO-M214, and first appeared according to different theories, either in Southeast Asia (see Rootsi 2006TMC ?Shi 2005, and Bradshaw ?) or East Asia (see ISOGG 2012) between 28,000 and 41,000 years before present(Scheinfeldt 2006).
Haplogroup O-M175 is one of NO-M214's two branches. The other is Haplogroup N, which is common throughout North Eurasia.[citation needed]

Distribution[edit]

This haplogroup appears in 80-90% of most of populations in East Asia and Southeast Asia, and it is almost exclusive to that region: M175 is almost nonexistent in Western SiberiaWestern AsiaEuropeAfrica, or the Americas, where its presence may be the result of recent migrations. Notably, certain subclades of Haplogroup O-M175 do achieve significant frequencies among some populations of South AsiaCentral Asia, and Oceania.
Among the subbranches of Haplogroup O-M175 are O-MSY2.2O-M268, and O-M122.[citation needed]

Paragroup O-M175[edit]

Paragroup O-M175 lineages, which belong to Haplogroup O-M175 but do not display any of the later mutations that define the major subclades O-MSY2.2, O-M268, and O-M122, can be detected at a low frequency among some modern populations of Central Asia and East Asia. A broad survey of Y-chromosome variation among populations of central Eurasia found haplogroup O-M175(xM119,M95,M122) in a significant minority of Koreans (Wells 2001). However, nearly all of these Korean O-M175(xM119,M95,M122) Y-chromosomes may belong to Haplogroup O-M176,[Footnote 1] and later studies do not support the finding of Paragroup O-M175(Xue 2005Kim 2011). O-M175(xM119,M95,M122) Y-chromosomes that have been found among these populations might therefore belong to Haplogroup O-MSY2.2*(xM119), Haplogroup O-M268*(xM95,M176), or Haplogroup O-M176.

O-MSY2.2+O-M26[edit]

http://www.isogg.org/tree/index.html
http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_HapgrpO.html

O   M175, P186, P191, P196
•    O*   -
•    O1   MSY2.2
•   •    O1*   -
•   •    O1a   M119, Page20
•   •    •    O1a*   -
•   •    •    O1a1   M307.1/P203.1
•   •    •   •    O1a1*   -
•   •    •   •    O1a1a   M101
•   •    •    O1a2   M50, M103, M110
•    O2   L463, L690, P31, M268
•   •    O2*   -
•   •    O2a   PK4
•   •    •    O2a*   -
•   •    •    O2a1   M95
•   •    •   •    O2a1*   -
•   •    •   •    O2a1a   M88, M111
•   •    O2b   IMS-JST022454, L272.2, M176//Page63/SRY465, M302, P49, Page92
•   •    •    O2b*   -
•   •    •    O2b1   M312
•   •    •   •    O2b1*   -
•   •    •   •    O2b1a   47z
•   •    •   •    O2b1b   L682
•    O3    CTS10736, CTS10753, F36, F400, F433, F471, F633, M122, P198
•   •    O3*   -
•   •    O3a   CTS8153, CTS8399, F27, F113, F129, F166, F341, F406, F572, F71, M324, P93/Page79, P197, P199, P200
•   •    •    O3a*   -
•   •    •    O3a1   L127.1, KL1/L465, KL2/L467
•   •    •   •    O3a1*   -
•   •    •   •    O3a1a   M121, DYS257_1/DYS257_2/P27.2_1/P27.2_2
•   •    •   •    O3a1b   M164
•   •    •   •    O3a1c   IMS-JST002611
•   •    •   •    •    O3a1c*   -
•   •    •   •    •    O3a1c1   F11, F425/Page69
•   •    •   •    •    O3a1c2   F238
•   •    •    O3a2   CTS8236, F525, IMS-JST021354/P201
•   •    •   •    O3a2*   -
•   •    •   •    O3a2a   M159/Page96
•   •    •   •    O3a2b   M7
•   •    •   •    •    O3a2b*   -
•   •    •   •    •    O3a2b1   M113, M188, M209
•   •    •   •    •   •    O3a2b1*   -
•   •    •   •    •   •    O3a2b1a   N5
•   •    •   •    O3a2c   CTS4723, CTS11109, CTS12099, F130, F131, F299, F422, F427, P164
•   •    •   •    •    O3a2c*   -
•   •    •   •    •    O3a2c1   M134
•   •    •   •    •   •    O3a2c1*   -
•   •    •   •    •   •    O3a2c1a   M117, M133, Page23
•   •    •   •    •   •    •    O3a2c1a*   -
•   •    •   •    •   •    •    O3a2c1a1   M162_1, M162_2
•   •    •   •    •   •    O3a2c1b   P101
•   •    •   •    •    O3a2c2   CTS1366, F706, F871, F996, F1481, F1598, F1645, F1672, F1693, F2029, F2083, F2139, F2469, F2654, F2683, F3223, F3237
•   •    •    O3a3   M300
•   •    •    O3a4   M333



J1c3d, L147+, Semitic group http://www.semargl.me/en/dna/ydna/haplotypes/

M175 and P203, O-Unknown group  http://www.semargl.me/en/dna/ydna/branch/132/snp/

Languages families and genes[edit]

The following is a phylogenetic tree of language families and their corresponding SNP markers, or haplogroups, sourced mainly from Edmondson 2007 and Shi 2005. This has been called the "Father Tongue Hypothesis" by George van Driem (vanDriem 2011).
"Proto- Asiatic" (O-M175) 
 Northern Asiatic (O-M122
 Sino-Tibetan (O-M134

 Sinitic (O-M117




 Hmong–Mien (O-M7


 Hmong (Miao) 





 Mien (Yao) 



 Southern Asiatic (Austric

 Austroasiatic (O-M95

 Munda 




 Austro-Tai (O-M119
 Austronesian 





 Tai–Kadai 


 Kam–Tai 



 Tai 






Q1a2 Huns

安徽赵氏, O1a1-P203+

Anhui Zhao, O1a1-P203 +

Found this guy whose surname is Zhao who have similar DNA as the ancient Chinese Premier Chou Chou of the Qin Dynasty O-M101

See surname Zhao
The town Zhao became part of the state of Jin during the Warring States period, when the Zhou Dynasty began to collapse. In 403 BC, Jin split into three smaller states, one of which was the state of Zhao. During this period, the common ancestral name Ying (嬴) split into 14 clan names: Lian (廉),Xu (徐), Jiang (江), Qin (秦), Zhao (趙), Huang (黄), Liang (梁), Ma (馬), Ge (葛), Gu (谷), Mou (繆), Zhong (鍾), Fei (費), and Qu (瞿).

P203 belongs to
Tujia (Jishou, Hunan)8.2%49Karafet 2010P203
Miao (China)6.9%58Karafet 2010P203
Kinh (Hanoi, Vietnam)6.6%76He 2012P203(xM101)
Samoa5.6%18Karafet 2010P203
Papua New Guinea Highlands3.0%33Karafet 2010P203
She2.0%51Karafet 2010P203
Yao (Guangxi)1.7%60Karafet 2010P203

O-M119 DNA of Han Chinese

In human genetics, Haplogroup O-MSY2.2 is a Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. Haplogroup O-MSY2.2 is a descendant branch of the greater Haplogroup O-M175. The great majority of Y-chromosomes within Haplogroup O-MSY2.2 belong to its O-M119 subclade.
Han (East China)24.0%167Yan 2011M119
This lineage is found frequently in Austronesians, southern Han Chinese, and Tai peoples.[citation needed] This lineage is presumed to be a marker of the prehistoric Austronesianexpansion, with possible origins encompassing the regions along the southeastern coast of China and neighboring Taiwan, and is found among modern populations of Maritime Southeast Asiaand Oceania (Karafet 2005).
Haplogroup O-MSY2.2 lineages are found primarily in Southeast Asian populations of MalaysiaVietnamIndonesia, the Philippines, southern China and Taiwan (ISOGG 2010). High frequencies of this haplogroup have been found in populations spread in an arc through southeastern China, Taiwan, the Philippines, and Indonesia. It has been found with generally lower frequency in samples from Oceania, mainland Southeast Asia, Southwest China, Northwest China, North China, Northeast China, Korea, Japan, North Asia, and Central Asia.


PopulationPercentageCountSourceSNPs
Nias100.0%60Karafet 2010M119
Nias99.8%407vanOven 2011M119
Taiwanese aborigines89.6%48Karafet 2010M119
Mentawai86.5%74Karafet 2010M119
Aboriginal Taiwanese83.4%223Tajima 2004M119
Taiwan (aborigines)71.8%39Hurles 2005M119(xM101)
Taiwan (aborigines)68.9%74Underhill 2000M119(xM101)
Hlai/Cun58%-Li 2008-
Philippine (Tagalog language group)46.0%50Tajima 2004M119
Philippines35.7%28Hurles 2005M119(xM101)
Kota Kinabalu29.2%65Hurles 2005M119
Trobriand Islands28%-Kayser 2003-
Li (Hlai)26.5%34Xue 2006M119
Malay (near Kuala Lumpur)25.0%12Tajima 2004M119
Han (East China)24.0%167Yan 2011M119
Han Chinese23%-Kayser 2003-
Java23%-Kayser 2003-
Nusa Tenggara23%-Kayser 2003-
Banjarmasin22.7%22Hurles 2005M119(xM101)
Balinese21.1%641Karafet 2010M119
Mandar20.4%54Karafet 2010M119(xP203)
Tujia20%-Su 1999-
Han (Meixian)20.0%35Xue 2006M119
Buka20.0%10Scheinfeldt 2006M119
Thin Board Mien18.2%11Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Majuro (Marshall Islands)18.2%11Hurles 2005M50
Admiralty Islands18%-Kayser 2008-
Balinese18%-Karafet 2005-
Sui18%-Xie 2004-
Zhuang18%-Su 1999-
Malagasy17.1%35Hurles 2005M50
Han (South China)16.9%65Yan 2011M119
Qiang15.2%33Xue 2006M119
Borneo15%-Kayser 2003-
Java14.8%61Karafet 2010M119
She14.7%34Xue 2006M119
Han (Chengdu)14.7%34Xue 2006M119
Manus14.3%7Scheinfeldt 2006M119
Palyu13.3%30Cai 2011M119
Batak Toba13.2%38Karafet 2010M119(xM110)
Sumba12.6%350Karafet 2010M119
Micronesia12.5%16Karafet 2010M119(xP203, M110)
Guizhou Miao12.2%49Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Lowland Kimmun12.2%41Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Thai (Northern Thailand)11.8%17He 2012P203(xM101)
Bunu11.1%36Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Filipinos10.4%48Karafet 2010M119
Zhuang10%-Hammer 2006-
Mountain Straggler Mien10.0%20Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Han (China & Taiwan)9.7%165Karafet 2010M119(xM110)
Flores9.6%394Karafet 2010M119(xM110)
Zhuang9.6%166Chen 2006-
Han (Taiwan)9.5%21Tajima 2004M119
Han (Yili)9.4%32Xue 2006M119
Borneo (Indonesia)9.3%86Karafet 2010M119
Bougainville9.2%65Scheinfeldt 2006M119
Top Board Mien9.1%11Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Northern Mien9.1%33Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Northern She8.9%56Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Thai (Chiang Mai & Khon Kaen)8.8%34Tajima 2004M119
Hui8.6%35Xue 2006M119
Mosuo (Ninglang, Yunnan)8.5%47Wen 2004M119(xM110)
Tonga8.3%12Karafet 2010M119(xP203, M110)
Tujia (Jishou, Hunan)8.2%49Karafet 2010P203
Hlai/Cun8%-Li 2008-
Ewenki (China)7.7%26Xue 2006M119
Xibe7.3%41Xue 2006M119
Hunan Miao7.0%100Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Tujia7%-Xie 2004-
Miao (China)6.9%58Karafet 2010P203
Katu6.7%45Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Moluccas6.7%30Karafet 2010M119
Han (Lanzhou)6.7%30Xue 2006M119
Kinh6.7%15Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Kinh (Hanoi, Vietnam)6.6%76He 2012P203(xM101)
Southern Mien6.5%31Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Malaysia6.3%32Karafet 2010M119(xM110)
Yunnan Miao6.1%49Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Northern Han6.1%49Tajima 2004M119
Bai (Dali, Yunnan)6.0%50Wen 2004M119(xM110)
Kyrgyz (Kyrgyzstan)5.8%52Wells 2001M119
Vietnam5.7%70Karafet 2010P203
Yao (Liannan, Guangdong)5.7%35Xue 2006M119
Samoa5.6%18Karafet 2010P203
Daur5.1%39Xue 2006M119
Cham (Binh Thuan, Vietnam)5.1%59He 2012M119(xM50)
Dungan (Kyrgyzstan)5.0%40Wells 2001M119
Maewo (Vanuatu)4.5%44Karafet 2010M119(xP203)
Korean4.4%45Wells 2001M119
Western Mien4.3%47Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Pumi (Ninglang, Yunnan)4.3%47Wen 2004M119(xM110)
Mongolian4.2%24Wells 2001M119
Western Samoa4.0%25Hurles 2005M119(xM101, M50)
New Ireland3.7%109Scheinfeldt 2006M119
Bo3.6%28Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Japanese3.4%263Nonaka 2007M119(xM101, M50)
Lembata3.3%92Karafet 2010M119(xM110)
Korean3.2%216Kim 2007M119
Han (North China)3.1%129Yan 2011M119(xM110)
Papua New Guinea Highlands3.0%33Karafet 2010P203
Manchu2.9%35Xue 2006M119
Han (Harbin)2.9%35Xue 2006M119
Buyi2.9%35Xue 2006M119
Yao (Bama, Guangxi)2.9%35Xue 2006M119
West New Britain2.8%249Scheinfeldt 2006M119
Lavongai2.3%43Scheinfeldt 2006M119
Laven2.0%50Cai 2011M119(xM110)
Yi (Shuangbai, Yunnan)2.0%50Wen 2004M119(xM110)
Hmong Daw (Laos)2.0%51Cai 2011M119(xM110)
She2.0%51Karafet 2010P203
Japanese (Kyushu)1.9%104Tajima 2004M119
Vanuatu1.9%52Hurles 2005M50
Yao (Guangxi)1.7%60Karafet 2010P203
Uygur1.4%70Xue 2006M119
East New Britain1.4%145Scheinfeldt 2006M119
A 2008 study by Li suggested that the admixtureanalyses of Tai–Kadai-speaking populations showed a

significant genetic influence in a large proportion of Indonesians. Most of the population samples contained a high frequency of haplogroup O-M119 (Hui 2008).
The frequencies of Haplogroup O-MSY2.2 among various East Asian and Austronesian populations suggest a complex genetic history of the modernHan populations of southern China.[citation needed]Although Haplogroup O-MSY2.2 occurs only at an average frequency of approximately 4% among Han populations of northern China and peoples of southwestern China and Southeast Asia who speak Tibeto-Burman languages, the frequency of this haplogroup among the Han populations of southern China nearly quadruples to about 15-23%.[citation needed] The frequency of Haplogroup O-MSY2.2 among the Southern Han has been found to be slightly greater than the arithmetic mean of the frequencies of Haplogroup O-MSY2.2 among the Northern Han and a pooled sample of Austronesian populations. This suggests that modern Southern Han populations may possess a non-trivial number of male ancestors who were originally affiliated with some Austronesian-related culture, or who at least shared a genetic affinity with many of the ancestors of modern Austronesian peoples.[citation needed]

YCC 2002/2008 (Shorthand)(α)(β)(γ)(δ)(ε)(ζ)(η)YCC 2002 (Longhand)YCC 2005 (Longhand)YCC 2008 (Longhand)YCC 2010r (Longhand)ISOGG 2006ISOGG 2007ISOGG 2008ISOGG 2009ISOGG 2010ISOGG 2011ISOGG 2012
O-M17526VII1U28Eu16H9IO*OOOOOOOOOO
O-M11926VII1U32Eu16H9HO1*O1aO1aO1aO1aO1aO1aO1aO1aO1aO1a
O-M10126VII1U32Eu16H9HO1aO1a1O1a1aO1a1aO1a1O1a1O1a1aO1a1aO1a1aO1a1aO1a1a
O-M5026VII1U32Eu16H10HO1bO1a2O1a2O1a2O1a2O1a2O1a2O1a2O1a2O1a2O1a2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O-MSY2.2
本帖最后由 沉默的群山 于 2013-9-17 18:22 编辑
http://www.ranhaer.com/thread-18347-1-1.html
已測試過的SNP位點有P203+),17-STR數值如下:
DYS19 DYS389I DYS389b DYS390 DYS391 DYS392 DYS393 DYS437 DYS438 DYS439 DYS448 DYS456 DYS458 DYS635 H4 DYS385a DYS385b
15 12 16 23 11 14 13 14 10 11 18 17 15 19 14 12 13
家传是宋裔德昭后,但无老谱,所以不确定。不过博士说我和绿兄STR差别较大,不太像一千年前共祖,如果说3、4千年共祖,没什么问题。又说STR变异琢磨不定,也不能排除1千年共祖的可能性。
供大家参考,呵呵


People from Anhui : Zhao Wei, Jiang Heping, Bu Wancang, Liu Bingjian, Zhao Puchu, Zhang Jingyao, Zhang Jindong, Zhang Shusheng, Xiao Zuoxin


What is subclade testing?

Subclade testing can provide increased resolution of your placement on the Y-chromosome phylogenetic tree.  Before your subclade can be determined, you must first know what haplogroup you belong to.  Haplogroups are defined by unique mutation events such as single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs.  These SNPs mark the branch of a haplogroup, and indicate that all descendents of that haplogroup at one time shared a common ancestor.  The Y-DNA SNP mutations were passed from father to son over thousands of years.  Over time, additional SNPs occur within a haplogroup, leading to new lineages.  These new lineages are considered subclades of the haplogroup.  Each time a new mutation occurs there is a new branch in the haplogroup, and therefore a new subclade.  By testing for the presence of SNPs that are known to be indicative of particular subclades, you can now determine the specific subclade you belong to within your haplogroup.

Origin of Y-DNA Haplogroup O

Haplogroup O, one of the 20 haplogroups found on the Y-chromosome tree (Figure 1), is thought to have appeared in East Asia approximately 35,000 years ago.  This haplogroup shares a node in the Y-chromosomal phylogenetic tree with Haplogroup N, which is common in North Eurasia.  The man carrying the SNP M175 was likely part of a migrating tribe whose progress was blocked by high mountain ranges; some of the tribe was forced north (leading to Haplogroup N), whereas another group, including the ancestor of Haplogroup O, continued east (Figure 2).  The migrants continued east across the southern part of Siberia and eventually crossed into Asia.  Today, Haplogroup O can be detected across Asia and Oceania (Table 1; Figure 3), and is prevalent in 80-90% of men in East and Southeast Asia (Su et al. 1999; Tajima et al. 2002; Jin et al. 2003; Hammer et al. 2006).  It is, however, almost nonexistent in Siberia, West Asia, and Europe, and is completely absent in Africa (Cruciani et al. 2008) and the Americas (Lell et al. 2002).

Figure 1.  The phylogenetic tree of the 20 known Y-DNA haplogroups.  Haplogroup
O is circled in blue to indicate its relative position within the tree. 

Figure 2.  Proposed migration path of Haplogroup O ancestors from Y-chromosomal Adam in Africa, carrying SNP mutation M91, to the unique mutation event causing SNP M175 that defines Haplogroup O.



Figure 3.  Worldwide frequency distribution of Haplogroup O.  The red area within each pie chart indicates the frequency of Haplogroup O within that location.  The labels and associated pie charts also indicate the average frequency of Haplogroup O within different language families of China.  It is clear from this frequency distribution map that Haplogroup O is most prevalent within East and Southeast Asia, with moderate frequencies detected in men from Central Asia and Oceania.  

1 comment:

  1. An Asians with Paternal Line Y Hg K2-M526, NO*-M214, N*-M231, O*-M175 and Q*-M242 and Maternal Line mtDNA Hg R Type: B and F are clearly share a common ancestors from Southern Central Asia like a European Y Hg R*-M207 + mtDNA Hg R Type: HV, H, V, JT, J, T, U and K and Native American Y Hg Q3-M3 + mtDNA Hg N Type: A, B, and X. Different with an Old East Asians like Siberian, Mongolian, Tibetan and Ainuid Japanese Jomon Y Hg C*-M130, C3/C2-M217, Y Hg D*-M174, D2-M55, D1... + mtDNA Hg M Type: CZ, C, Z, D and G, mtDNA Hg N Type: A, Y, N9a,.....

    ReplyDelete